Dina Lohan is fighting mad!  She believes that the new film (that hasn’t actually started filming yet) ‘Dogs in Pocketbooks’ is based on her daughter Lindsay’s life.      Initially, Dogs in Pocketbooks scribe Charles Casillo told the New York Post that “Lydia will play a bratty movie goddess in and out of rehab, in trouble with the law, and hounded by greedy agents, predatory paparazzi, off-the-wall stalkers and crazed media — a role obviously based on Lindsay Lohan.” 

Later, he realized that that was not a smart statement to make and he recanted by saying,  that the movie “is in no way mean-spirited towards Lindsay. It’s the kind of thing she has spoofed about herself in the past. It’s more of a satire about the crazy people around her and the situations they generate. It satirizes the obsession with modern celebrity.”

Dina was fooled by that smoke screen!  She is threatening to sue ‘anyone involved in the Production of  ‘Dogs in Pocketbooks’.  She recognizes that her Daughter is indeed the’ bratty movie goddess in and out of rehab, in trouble with the law, and hounded by greedy agents, predatory paparazzi, off-the-wall stalkers and crazed media’ that the film revolves about.  The Lohan family Lawyer Stephanie Ovadia says that the film is definitely using Lindsay’s likeness without compensating her. 

Wait……would it be okay for the Pocketbook movie to be made, if there were some compensation?  Initially, I thought that Dina was trying to protect her Daughter’s image, but are they fishing for some moulah?   

 26 year old Heiress Lydia Hearst was set to play the ‘Lindsay’ role.  Now, she is distancing herself from the role.  She tweeted, “As for any theatrical roles I am currently filming Two Jacks directed by Bernard Rose. My next project is Catwalk by Tony Hickox. At this time I am not officially signed onto any other projects.”

Translation…..I’m not even trying to be bothered with any drama!

source, photo

Advertisements